英语吧 关注:1,534,250贴子:11,389,256

【March·话题】nytimes say: "WTF?"

只看楼主收藏回复

早上微博上看到的,差点把豆浆打倒


IP属地:四川1楼2020-03-12 11:47回复
    如果你刚从意大利回来,并真实了解意大利的*lockdown*情况,你就不会那么激动了。—— 我只是为了你的无辜的豆浆sake


    IP属地:上海3楼2020-03-12 11:54
    收起回复
      我被这条消息吓尿了,赶紧找来梯子去墙外看看消息源头
      I was shocked by this tweet, so I throw my breakfast away, and grab my ladder(V-P-N) to go out of the wall to check the source of this news immediately.


      IP属地:四川4楼2020-03-12 12:08
      回复
        我公司对接欧洲,所以每天都有很多那边的真实信息来源。
        其实那里一切都还挺好,和平时没啥两样,该吃吃该喝喝。同事们拍来的照片全是在餐厅或酒吧里,1/10的居民开始戴口罩
        除了两点:
        1是医疗瘫痪了,医生怕感染,嫌累,不愿上班。所以很多人如果真的病了,那只能自己修仙。也有轻症不愿去急诊室被交叉感染的缘故
        2是公交瘫痪了,
        现在那里有很多国际支援组织,也有不少中国的。- 中国队是属于有经验的志愿者,很受当地欢迎 - 很多地方打出了*感谢所有中国人的援助*之类的牌子


        IP属地:上海5楼2020-03-12 12:10
        回复
          小伙伴们,请允许我把故事讲完...
          Guys, allow me to finish this story


          IP属地:四川6楼2020-03-12 12:15
          回复
            截了几张Twitter上The New York Times上的原始推文图片
            Here are some snapshots of The New York Times on twitter



            IP属地:四川7楼2020-03-12 12:34
            回复
              Wow~~~还有中文版,速来围观
              Cool... There is a Chinese version, check this out.


              IP属地:四川9楼2020-03-12 12:52
              回复
                最有趣的部分来了,我们来看看这位Amy Qin是何方神圣?
                Alright, here comes the most interesting part, let's find out who is this Amy Qin?


                IP属地:四川10楼2020-03-12 13:07
                回复
                  人民日报脸上烫不烫?暂且不说Amy Qin,还把2个不相干的人发的推文硬生生的拼一起,就因为都从nytimes输出?而且还把“but at what cost”无限放大... “《纽约时报》似乎并不担心病魔会夺走多少生命,而是反复算着政治账,赞意大利,猛踩中国...”。
                  全国人民都看上不了Twitter,看不了这些叽叽喳喳的东西,心理舒坦。人民日报可以上,上了Twitter然后来说一些挑拨离间的话,故意引起人民心中的怒火,有意思吗?这种大灾难面前谈政治脑壳里装的都是屎吗?


                  IP属地:四川11楼2020-03-12 13:32
                  回复
                    楼主找错人了
                    去问总结大意的新乡时报编辑吧


                    IP属地:广西12楼2020-03-12 14:44
                    收起回复
                      不担心人命是因为死了是安躺主的怀抱。
                      死就死了,死了是永生的开始。
                      对向往死亡的文化,这些都是合情合理的。


                      13楼2020-03-12 21:22
                      回复
                        if you have time you can read all the copies of Purple's Daily from the first day till now to see how ridiculous itself is
                        Louzhu could post here more of the good things that we can't get access to so that we can open our eyes


                        IP属地:广西14楼2020-03-12 22:34
                        回复
                          To be honestly, I'm not interested in these stupid political stuff. I've never noticed what kind of content are on the Weibo account of People's Daily until I saw that picture showed accidentally in my WeChat moments. So, the first thing coming to my mind is NY Times — You mother****er, what did you say??? Few seconds later, I let my brain calm and trying to figure it out WTF things just happened.
                          After I found out that things were not as simple as the People's Daily posted, I was totally freaking out. The content of the official Weibo account was not true!!! It was broke my belief system, If we can't believe official news who we could be believed in??? I was deep trusted official news before I dogged this fake news out. Now, it seems quite like a joke. IMHO, It should be irresistible, integrality, and strictly researched that everything coming from official account.
                          And it made thousands of thousands Chinese people getting angered after they saw that shit faked news. What's the purpose? To let people love their country more??? I don't think so, patriotism is not coming from those kinds of shit stuff. You may say that I don't love my country. No one wear patriotism on their shoulder, but to me, I try to practice patriotism honestly, knowledgeably, and quietly in everyday. Whatever, I will not get angry next time the same sorts of news coming out.


                          IP属地:四川15楼2020-03-13 09:58
                          回复
                            请不要讨论政治铭感话题


                            IP属地:浙江16楼2020-03-13 11:23
                            回复