原文：https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x/15
In total I ran nearly 400 benchmarks across all the CPUs. When taking the geometric mean of all the raw performance results, the Ryzen 9 9950X came out to being 17.8% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X. The Ryzen 9 9900X meanwhile was 21.5% faster than the Ryzen 9 7900X across this wide mix of workloads. The Ryzen 9 9950X was 33% faster than the Intel Core i9 14900K performance overall and even the Ryzen 9 9900X was 18% faster than the Core i9 14900K. For those still on AM4, the Ryzen 9 9950X was delivering 1.87x the performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X processor. These are some great gains found with the Ryzen 9 9900 series.
With the Intel Core benchmarks it's also worth mentioning that the testing was prior to the newly-released Intel 0x129 microcode update and I'll have more benchmarks with that change soon. As of writing the Core i9 14900K is retailing for around $550 USD while the Ryzen 9 9950X is set to retail for around 18% more but delivering 33% greater performance on a geo mean basis overall. The Ryzen 9 9900X meanwhile at $499 is around $50 less than the i9-14900K while overall delivering 18% better performance. A slam dunk in performance, value, and power efficiency with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900 series compared to the competition.
CPU Power Consumption Monitor benchmark with settings of Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring.
Making the Ryzen 9 9900 series results even more impressive was their power use. Over the span of all the benchmarks, the Ryzen 9 9950X had an average power use of 137 Watts and a peak of 201 Watts. The Ryzen 9 7950X meanwhile had a 142 Watt average and 236 Watt peak while the Core i9 14900K had a 156 Watt average and 347 Watt peak. Stunning power efficiency results with the Ryzen 9000 series. The Ryzen 9 9900X also came out well with a 117 Watt average compared to 133 Watts with the Ryzen 9 7900X.
Geometric Mean Of Timed Code Compilation Tests benchmark with settings of Result Composite, AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, Ryzen 9 9950X Linux Performance Benchmarks. Ryzen 9 9950X was the fastest.
For those doing a lot of code compilation either as part of a software development job, running a source-based Linux distribution like Gentoo or Arch Linux, or looking at Ryzen for budget servers for a CI/CD build farm, the Ryzen 9 7950X is a fabulous option for its performance and power efficiency. Across all of the codebases tested there were great speed-ups with the Ryzen 9 9950X and 9900X compared to the Intel competition and prior Ryzen 7000 series parts.
Geometric Mean Of Creator Workloads Tests benchmark with settings of Result Composite, AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, Ryzen 9 9950X Linux Performance Benchmarks. Ryzen 9 9950X was the fastest.
Across the dozens of creator workloads from Blender and other renderers to imaging tasks and similar workloads, the Ryzen 9 9950X geo mean there was 1.18x the performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X or 1.42x the performance of the Core i9 14900K.
In total I ran nearly 400 benchmarks across all the CPUs. When taking the geometric mean of all the raw performance results, the Ryzen 9 9950X came out to being 17.8% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X. The Ryzen 9 9900X meanwhile was 21.5% faster than the Ryzen 9 7900X across this wide mix of workloads. The Ryzen 9 9950X was 33% faster than the Intel Core i9 14900K performance overall and even the Ryzen 9 9900X was 18% faster than the Core i9 14900K. For those still on AM4, the Ryzen 9 9950X was delivering 1.87x the performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X processor. These are some great gains found with the Ryzen 9 9900 series.
With the Intel Core benchmarks it's also worth mentioning that the testing was prior to the newly-released Intel 0x129 microcode update and I'll have more benchmarks with that change soon. As of writing the Core i9 14900K is retailing for around $550 USD while the Ryzen 9 9950X is set to retail for around 18% more but delivering 33% greater performance on a geo mean basis overall. The Ryzen 9 9900X meanwhile at $499 is around $50 less than the i9-14900K while overall delivering 18% better performance. A slam dunk in performance, value, and power efficiency with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900 series compared to the competition.
CPU Power Consumption Monitor benchmark with settings of Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring.
Making the Ryzen 9 9900 series results even more impressive was their power use. Over the span of all the benchmarks, the Ryzen 9 9950X had an average power use of 137 Watts and a peak of 201 Watts. The Ryzen 9 7950X meanwhile had a 142 Watt average and 236 Watt peak while the Core i9 14900K had a 156 Watt average and 347 Watt peak. Stunning power efficiency results with the Ryzen 9000 series. The Ryzen 9 9900X also came out well with a 117 Watt average compared to 133 Watts with the Ryzen 9 7900X.
Geometric Mean Of Timed Code Compilation Tests benchmark with settings of Result Composite, AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, Ryzen 9 9950X Linux Performance Benchmarks. Ryzen 9 9950X was the fastest.
For those doing a lot of code compilation either as part of a software development job, running a source-based Linux distribution like Gentoo or Arch Linux, or looking at Ryzen for budget servers for a CI/CD build farm, the Ryzen 9 7950X is a fabulous option for its performance and power efficiency. Across all of the codebases tested there were great speed-ups with the Ryzen 9 9950X and 9900X compared to the Intel competition and prior Ryzen 7000 series parts.
Geometric Mean Of Creator Workloads Tests benchmark with settings of Result Composite, AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, Ryzen 9 9950X Linux Performance Benchmarks. Ryzen 9 9950X was the fastest.
Across the dozens of creator workloads from Blender and other renderers to imaging tasks and similar workloads, the Ryzen 9 9950X geo mean there was 1.18x the performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X or 1.42x the performance of the Core i9 14900K.
